Home Climate Facts Climate Briefs Alarmist Rebuttals Failed Predictions Historic News Clipings News Reports Russian Money How They Lie to YOU Its OK to Lie! CO2 Facts Warm Periods Lack Of Data Electricity Cost Climate Is Normal Heat/Cold Deaths Wild Fires Green New Deal No Rapid Waring Sun - Real Cause of Climate Alarmist errors C13/C12 Isotope Ratio oregon_climate_plan Tipping Points Climate Predictions IPCC Says Our Best Data 22 Inconvenient Truths Medieval Warm Period Extinctions Propaganda Fossil Fuel subsidies Who's Lying? What is Real Science Peer Review Adjustment Example proxies Climate Papers Debunking Claims NASA Debunk Antarctic Loss Renewables Corals Trillion Dollar Industry Big Money Scaring green money Paid by fossil fuel Warming Stopped Media Lies People are Dying History (politics) Extreme Weather? Its Warming,But Acidification IPCC_Flawed IPCC Prediction Fail IPCC_Disproved IPCC_PeerReview IPCC Scientists IPCC&CLouds WWF Infiltrated the IPCC Harming People misconduct Data Adjustments Major Data Tampering Cooling since 1945? Drought, hurricanes etc. Arctic History Selected Emails Selected Quotes Fraud Of Century? 97 percent of scientists 97% is meaningless 25% of AMS / 50% JonesInterview An OK Prediction Data Sources Record Temperature Energy Facts GridStorage CostlyEnergy Michael Mann Mann's Book Wegman on Mann paper styn_vs_mann Peer Review Error Statistical Errors The Sun Solar OceanHeat Ocean Heat Polar Bears OK AlGore's Errors Ask Questions Climate Models Record Highs Local Food Threats Why I'm a Skeptic GreenhouseMoon Alternative Energy 1350+ realist papers Conflict of Interest? Muzzeled Scientists How To Argue Common Ground Hurricane

Debunking the Climate Scam

Billions of Dollars -  Fudged Data  -  Corrupt Scientists

Greedy Green Corporations - Trillion Dollar Prize

No Warming For Two decades - Illiterate Media

Bought and Paid For Organizations

5000 Years Of Climate Change From Greenland Ice Cores

Its Warming, but the real question is:

IS there anything different about the current warming compared to previous warmings?

Logically, only after we answer yes to that question, can we go looking for a cause different than the cause of the previous warming.

As C3Headlines shows below, using official British government data from its Met Office, the current warming is indistinguishable from the warming 100 years ago!

There is only one logical  conclusion:

The current warming is caused by the same factors that caused the previous warming

and CO2 is irrelevant.

From C3 Headlines:

IPCC's Gold-Standard HadCRUT Confirms: CO2's Impact On Global Temps Statistically Immaterial & Insignificant

The extreme anti-CO2 jihadists, and the green-fundamentalists at the UN's IPCC, claim that modern warming has been historically unusual, unique and statistically "significant" due to human CO2 emissions - yet, when the UK's HadCRUT4 global temperature dataset is examined, it is readily apparent that modern temperature change is primarily a repeat of the past natural climate patterns

(click on chart to enlarge; data sources)

Global warming modern 60 year vs previous 60 years Hadcrut co2Recently, the UK's MetOffice was forced to admit to Parliament that global warming since the 1850's has not been statistically significant - read here, here and here.

In essence, for the recent modern warming to be statistically significant, then there should be no earlier periods exhibiting a similar warming trend and monthly variation that occurred when CO2 levels were low.

So, exactly how hard was it to find an earlier warming period that took place under a low atmospheric CO2 regime that had similar traits? Hmmm.....not so hard, as it turn out.

Despite the previous statistical gyrations the MetOffice utilized to convince both lawmakers and the public that human CO2 emissions caused modern global warming to be "statistically" unique, in fact, upon analysis, the recent modern warming is typical of past natural climate variation.

Without conducting the type of statistical analysis that forced the MetOffice admission of being wrong (you can read about at those above article links), one can easily recognize earlier periods exhibiting similarity. The adjacent chart depicts such a similar period.

As can be discerned visually from the chart, the modern warming over the last 60 years (green data plots) ending April 2013 has obvious similarities to the 60-year climate period ending November 1949 (blue data plots). These two 720-month periods look very similar with the exception of atmospheric CO2 growth.

Read the rest at:  C3 Headlines: