Home They Pay for Climate Stories Attacks on Scientists Climate Facts IPCC Says Climate Briefs Alarmist Rebuttals Failed Predictions Historic News Clipings News Reports Russian Money Cost of renewable How They Lie to YOU Its OK to Lie! Not A Conspiracy CO2 Facts Warm Periods Lack Of Data Electricity Cost Climate Is Normal Heat/Cold Deaths Wild Fires Green New Deal No Rapid Waring Sun - Cause of Climate Alarmist errors C13/C12 Isotope Ratio oregon_climate_plan Tipping Points Fail: Climate Predictions Our Best Data 22 Inconvenient Truths Medieval Warm Period Extinctions Propaganda Fossil Fuel subsidies Who's Lying? What is Real Science Peer Review Adjustment Example proxies Climate Papers Debunking Claims NASA Debunk Antarctic Loss Renewables Corals Trillion Dollar Industry Big Money Scaring green money Paid by fossil fuel Warming Stopped Media Lies People are Dying History (politics) Past Was Warmer Extreme Weather? Its Warming,But Acidification IPCC_Flawed IPCC Prediction Fail IPCC_Disproved IPCC_PeerReview IPCC Scientists IPCC&CLouds WWF Infiltrated the IPCC Harming People misconduct Data Adjustments Major Data Tampering Cooling since 1945? Drought, hurricanes etc. Arctic History Selected Emails Selected Quotes Fraud Of Century? 97 percent of scientists 97% is meaningless 25% of AMS / 50% JonesInterview An OK Prediction Data Sources Record Temperature Energy Facts GridStorage CostlyEnergy Michael Mann Mann's Book Wegman on Mann paper styn_vs_mann Peer Review Error Statistical Errors The Sun Solar OceanHeat Ocean Heat Polar Bears OK AlGore's Errors Ask Questions Climate Models Record Highs Local Food Threats Why I'm a Skeptic GreenhouseMoon Alternative Energy 1350+ realist papers Conflict of Interest? Muzzeled Scientists How To Argue Common Ground Hurricane No Proof NW Snow Pack James Hansen Consensus The Hockey Stick 650 Dissenters Easy Solution DataQuality Heat Island Is Science Settled? Ocean Level Sea Level sea_&_islands Glaciers Ice Sheets Greenland Gore's Mentor OGWC Articles Summary FinancialPapers OtherMotivations PeakOil Ozone Hole Fracking Acid Rain No Limits Videos Printables Links EcoTretas Selected Emails Briffa et al (1998) data

Debunking the Climate Scam

Billions of Dollars -  Fudged Data  -  Corrupt Scientists

Greedy Green Corporations - Trillion Dollar Prize

No Warming For Two decades - Illiterate Media

Bought and Paid For Organizations

5000 Years Of Climate Change From Greenland Ice Cores

Some Important Points

(This section is being worked on!)

big Money IS BUYING MEDIA coverage

“They are pouring money into those efforts, as the German journalist Axel Bojanowski pointed out, to a degree that would make the oil lobby blush. At the "Climate Action Summit" in 2018, two dozen billionaire-backed foundations pledged 4 billion dollars for climate-change lobbying. Some of them, like the Hewlett Foundation, are directly funding journalists at the Associated Press for "climate reporting," while foundations associated with the Packard and Rockefeller families have been backing the journalistic endeavor "Covering Climate Now," which "collaborates with journalists and newsrooms to produce more informed and urgent climate stories" and is financing hundreds of media outlets.”   From:


1. Why would the 97% World’s Scientists lie to us?

First, it is NOT 97% , but closer to 25% that believe man is influencing (not harming) the climate. Even that is actually meaningless.  Even fewer believe we are facing harmful warming. A Recent IPCC report puts the lie to most scare stories.  

2. Of course some do lie-There are billions/trillions of dollars being made off of the climate scam. Russia is supporting anti fracking (and probably a lot more "environmental" activism.)  Big Money Scaring People  Trillion Dollar Industry;   Green Money;   Russian Money  


3. Claims of  Paid by Fossil Fuel companies appear to be lies.

4. There is a long history of scary predictions, all/most have failed to come true. http://www.debunkingclimate.com/failedpredictions.html

Failed Predictions   More   Past climate scares  

Actual past Climate  1970s Cooling scare  



More more  more  more  Extinction Clock   

5. The peer review system is broken  http://www.debunkingclimate.com/peer-review.html

6. Top scientists were found to be engaging in unethical conduct, including changing data to make it fit their pre-conceived notions and soliciting money from oil companies. http://www.debunkingclimate.com/SelectedEmails.html

7. Media constantly exaggerates climate events: http://www.debunkingclimate.com/page183.html

8. Even NASA lies to us.  http://www.debunkingclimate.com/CO2_didnt_warm_arctic.html, http://www.debunkingclimate.com/nasa_debunk.html

9. Published climate history is not the actual measurements, but "adjusted" data which shows much more warming than actual measurements.   Data adjustments


97% consensus of scientists claim is false.  No Consensus    http://www.debunkingclimate.com/AMSSurvey.html

We have little real climate data before 1979, the beginning of truly world wide coverage with satellites. No coverage of most oceans, little coverage out of USA & Europe before 1941, little coverage of Africa & Sourth America even later.  

Thus any thing that relys on world climate data before 1979 is pure cojecture.

How they make cooling look like warming by choosing the starting point of data to show instead of showing all of the data

The 1970's Global Cooling Compilation – looks much like today

Top scientist shows the lie in the “hockeystick” used by Al Gore & the IPCC

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BQpciw8suk&feature=play er_embedded



GREEN NEW DEAL is really a plan for World Government

“The interesting thing about the Green New Deal,” he said, “is it wasn’t originally a climate thing at all.” …Chakrabarti continued. “Because we really think of it as a how-do-you-change-the-entire-economy thing.”

Extreme Fraud In The National Climate Assessment

When the National Climate Assessment was released last fall, a massive barrage of hysterical propaganda came with it – like this article in The Atlantic saying we are all going to burn up, based on an increase in US heat waves since the 1960s. https://realclimatescience.com/2019/02/heat-wave-fraud-in-the-national-climate-assessment/  (L)

Extreme Wildfire Fraud In The National Climate Assessment

Yesterday I showed how the National Climate Assessment is committing blatant fraud about heat waves, by hiding the data which shows their claims are inverted from reality. In this post, I show how they are doing exactly the same thing with wildfires. They show US burn acreage rapidly increasing.  https://realclimatescience.com/2019/02/extreme-wildfire-fraud-in-the-national-climate-assessment/  (L)

National Climate Assessment: A crisis of epistemic overconfidence

I’ve just completed rereading Vol I of the NCA4.  There is so much here of concern that it is difficult to know where to start.  I have been very critical of the IPCC in the past (but I will certainly admit that the AR5 was a substantial improvement over the AR4).  While the NCA4 shares some common problems with the IPCC AR5, the NCA4 makes the IPCC AR5 look like a relative paragon of rationality.  by Judith Curry  https://judithcurry.com/2019/01/02/national-climate-assessment-a-crisis-of-epistemic-overconfidence/  (L)

Alarmist Claim Fact Checks

Below are a series of rebuttals of the most common climate alarmists’ claims such as those made in the recently released Fourth National Climate Assessment Report.[2] The authors of these rebuttals are all recognized experts in the relevant scientific fields. The rebuttals demonstrate the falsity of EPA’s claims merely by citing the most credible empirical data on the topic. https://alarmistclaimresearch.wordpress.com/  (L)


How To Tell Who Is Right In The Climate Debate Without Science

Sierra Club Leader Explains the Evidence

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VzCXwF39enc

Former UN Climate Chief:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=emxQFL2DNYA

22 Inconvenient Climate Truths


Foreign Oil Money Stopping Our Oil Production!

Russia & UAE finance anti fracking

US Gov:

Climate Alarm is $100 Billion Industry

½ of Peer Reviewed Articles Wrong:



NIPCC Report


Top Physics Expert

Will Happer on Global Warming    (Local)

2014 NOT warmest year ever

Evidence that planet is cooling

The 1970’s Global Cooling Compilation – looks much like today

A compilation of news articles on the global cooling scare of the 1970’s   local

Similar: 1970s Global Cooling Alarmism  local

Evidence that CO2 doesn’t cause Arctic warming or rapid warming

Compelling Evidence That Increased CO2 Did Not Cause Increased Arctic Temperature

Compelling Evidence That Increased CO2 Did Not Increase the Rate of Warming

The Best Case for CO2 Causing Warming

The best case that a leading climate researchers was able to make is that we know the warming (that statistically stopped in 1995, and slightly reversed since 2005) was caused by man’s CO2 because we cannot figure out anything else!

Impartial American Physics Society  Climate Discussion

Transcript of APS workshop

Blog of one participant

WattsUpWithThat Blog: Notes on the APS Workshop

IPCC: Not peer reviewed

 Students as experts

WWF infiltration

New Study: 30% of IPCC report references ARE NOT PEER REVIEWED

Some IPCC claimed “best experts” and “top scientists” had yet to complete their PhD/Masters more more   

How the WWF Infiltrated the IPCC – Part 1  

How the WWF Infiltrated the IPCC – Part 2

Here an Activist, There an Activist  

WWF-Affiliated Personnel in Working Group 1

Important Information


22 Very Inconvenient Climate Truths


How to Argue With a True Believer

Debunking Merchants of Doubt

Dagfinn Reiersol

Reiner Grundman

Judith Curry

New York Times Lies on Climate

NASA Lies on Climate

The New Claim - Extreme Weather

Global warming is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud

I have seen in my long life

Fraud or Fraud of the Century?

450 Peer Reviewed Papers


List of some useful blogs/web pages

http://jonova.s3.amazonaws.com/sh1/the_skeptics_ handbook_2-3_lq.pdf

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/pa pers/originals/climate_money.pdf

http://DebunkingClimate.com  (Mostly collection of articles)

http://wattsupwiththat.com   (Long time weatherman)

http://www.drroyspencer.com/  (Keeps one of two official satellite climate records)

http://judithcurry.com/   (Head of university department)

http://joannenova.com.au   (look at her climate booklets)

http://realclimatescience.com/  (lots of old newspaper clippings)


http://junkscience.com   (By a physician)


http://www.climateaudit.org/   (The guy who showed Al Gore’s hockey stick was a fraud)

http://www.climatedepot.com/  (a bit sensational but lots of good links)

Read what top climate scientists really say:

http://www.debunkingclimate.com/selectedemails.ht ml

http://www.lavoisier.com.au/articles/greenhouse-science/climate-change/climategate-emails.pdf   (local)  VERY EXTENSIVE!


http://www.inhofe.senate.gov/download/?id=ce3505 5e-8922-417f-b416-800183ab7272&download=1


http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/20/ climate-cuttings-33.html


Real scientists DO NOT COMMIT CRIMES such as subverting the FOI, nor ask others to destroy data. Real scientists pursue the truth, not block publishing of opposing information.

Before you read this evidence, ask yourself what, if anything, convinced you that we have a “climate crisis”?  Is that evidence as good as what is presented here? (Be sure to follow the links to the actual evidence supporting most claims.)

Evidence that Man’s CO2 Is NOT Causing Global Warming

1. There is nothing unusual about our climate compared to climate history, therefore nothing to explain with man’s CO2

2. Earlier, warmer, warm periods: Minoan, Roman & Medieval,  were warmer than now, and all were BEFORE man used fossil fuels.  Are we to believe that whatever caused those earlier warm periods, each 1000 years apart, just quit causing warm periods so than man’s CO2 could take over the job right on schedule?

3. Solar cycles are a better fit to climate than CO2, thus negating the claim that the simultaneous rise of temperature and CO2 proves CO2 is causing increased temperature.

4. Recent warming is a  same rate as the late 1800s  but now with much more of man’s CO2. (More of a cause should cause more effect.)
5. Our current CO2 rise is after the Medieval warm period and is broadly consistent with CO2 rise after the end of ice ages.

6. CO2 rises AFTER temperature rises, not before, and falls before CO2 falls and thus cannot be the cause of the temperature rise.
7. No one has shown actual evidence that man's CO2 is causing serious global warming.  (Still waiting for actual evidence.) Many papers show CO2 has little effect.

Even the IPCC debunks climate alarmism:

–>The Earth only warmed 0.78degree C since 1850 (to 2012).  (0.48 C/century)

–>We do not have enough data to say that hurricanes have increased.

–>We do not have enough data to say that storms have increased.

–>Sea level has been rising for centuries, it HAS NOT RISEN FASTER recently.

–>There is little, if any, global scale changes in the magnitude or frequency of floods.

–>Confidence is low for a global-scale observed trend in drought or dryness

–>Prediction of future climate is not possible.

In view of this, why does anyone think we have a climate problem?

The above is a short version. The complete version is http://www.debunkingclimate.com/ipcc_says.html

There Is Nothing Unusual About Our Climate

(Nothing unusual means there is no role for man’s CO2)

No increase in storms  NOAA

No increase in hurricanes  NOAA Dr.Ryan N. Maue

No increase in floods  More

No increase in droughts  More  

No unusual increase in sea levels  More level-fraud

No rapid warming  Phil Jones  CET  

It was warmer in earlier times

Decreased  Forest fires  More

No increase in record heat More

Similar from other sources: debunking  More   IPCC


The above shows we DO NOT have a climate problem, thus there is not CO2 problem.  

News - Failed Predictions & Actual Climate       

Failed Predictions   More   Past climate scares  

Actual past Climate  1970s Cooling scare  

Some climate facts:

Fact:  Minoan, Egyptian, Roman and Medieval times were warmer than recently.

Evidence: Grootes, P.M., Stuiver, M., White, J.W.C., Johnsen, S.J., Jouzel J., Comparison of oxygen isotope records from the GISP and GRIP Greenland ice cores. Nature 366,1993, pp. 552-554. Graphed at: http://www.sustainableoregon.com/temphist.html

Evidence: R.B. Alley, The Younger Dryas cold interval as viewed from central Greenland. Journal of Quaternary Science Reviews 19:213-226 graphed at http://www.sustainableoregon.com/climatehistory.html

Fact:  A careful study of climate history showed that there is a strong likelihood that the major portion of temperature change in the 20th century was due to natural variations.

Evidence:  the Holocene records up to 8000 years before present, from several ice cores were examined.  

. . . The average standard deviation of temperature was 0.98 ± 0.27 °C. This suggests that while some portion of the temperature change observed in the 20th century was probably caused by greenhouse gases, there is a strong likelihood that the major portion was due to natural variations.

From:  An Estimate of The Centennial Variability of Global Temperatures, Philip J. Lloyd,   DOI: 10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417,  http://multi-science.atypon.com/doi/abs/10.1260/0958-305X.26.3.417  (Local)

Fact:  Solar cycles are a better fit to climate than CO2.  

Evidence:  Shaviv, N. J., 2005. On climate response to changes in the cosmic ray flux and radiative budget. J. Geophys. Rsch., VOL. 110, A08105, doi:10.1029/2004JA010866, 2005

Friis-Christensen, E., and K. Lassen, Science, 254, 698-700, 1991  http://www.sustainableoregon.com/thesun.html

More Evidence: “...most of the temperature trends since at least 1881 can be explained in terms of solar variability, with atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations providing at most a minor contribution.    Soon, Connolly, and Connolly   

Fact:  In most studies CO2 follows temperature, not leads it (a cause cannot follow the effect)

Evidence: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=13 (ignore the speculation that further warming “could in fact have been caused by CO2” - it is mere speculation as shown by the word “could”.)

More: http://www.debunkingclimate.com/co2_lags-papers.html

Fact:  Man’s CO2 has never been proven to cause dangerous warming.

Fact:  The rate of the current warming is statistically indistinguishable from earlier warm periods.

Evidence: Phil Jones BBC interview, question A, http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/science/nature/8511670.stm

Fact: Actual sea level rise is a harmless 7 inches/century

Evidence: NOAA: “the absolute global sea level rise is believed to be 1.7-1.8 millimeters/year. ‘    (Local)

Fact:  Current ocean rise is within historical norms.   

Evidence: http://www.hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/10/new-paper-shows-global-sea-level-rise.html description of http://www.ocean-sci-discuss.net/11/2029/2014/osd-11-2029-2014.html



Fact:  Glaciers retreated FASTER in the 1930s than recently   

Evidence: http://www.sustainableoregon.com/glaciers.html

FACT: The cold waters of Earth’s deep ocean have not warmed measurably since 2005

Evidence: http://www.nasa.gov/press/2014/october/nasa-study-finds-earth-s-ocean-abyss-has-not-warmed/#.VKkWg3uul8E

Fact:  Water vapor causes most of the greenhouse effect

Evidence: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=142

Fact: CO2 only causes 9-26% of greenhouse effect.

Evidence: “ CO2 alone makes up between 9 and 26%” http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=142

Fact:  Man only emits about 5% of the annual CO2 emissions, the rest is from nature. NASA

Evidence: Add up the numbers on the NASA drawing: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/CarbonCycle/page1. php  They show man emits 4.3% of the annual emissions (man: 9; nature: 210)

Former EPA scientist comes clean on climate This is a thorough debunking of the climate scam by an EPA employee who was forced to leave because of his telling the truth.  (Local)

Exhaustive study finds more CO2 will not cause dangerous warming      (local)


The evidence for the above:

IPCC covers most of those here

Warmer than now:  Minoan, Roman & Medieval warm periods



Cooler than now:  little ice age

faster rate of change than now (per CET): 1740, 1878




Storms normal:

http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/images/tornado/clim/E F3-EF5.png;  http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/images/tornado/clim/ EF1-EF5.png;  http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/gw_hurricanes/fig33.jpg

Floods normal:


Droughts normal:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v491/n7424/full/nature1157 5.html


Snow normal:



Sea level normal: http://www.jcronline.org/doi/abs/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-10-00157.1?code=cerf-site

CO2 FOLLOWS temperature:

: http://www.debunkingclimate.com/co2_lags-papers.html

free counters

Big Money In Scaring  People


to Your Standard of Living!

Oregon is on the verge of increasing the cost of electricity, increasing the cost of heating your home, increasing the cost of gasoline and destroying thousands of jobs over an imagined danger.

This is the recommendation  of Oregon's Global Warming Commission. The key element of this recommendation  is implementation of a system that will require carbon offsets or  credits for much of the fuel usage in Oregon.  Amazingly, the head of Oregon's Global Warming Commission is chairman of a company that sells carbon  offsets!

Oregon recently created the Oregon Climate Change Research Institute to  be headed by Philip W. Mote, the Washington state climatologist, who will  become a professor in the College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences at  Oregon State University, where the institute will be located.   Unfortunately, Mr. Mote has been implicated in fudging scientific data which falsely created the impression of dramatic  melting of Northwest Glaciers, while long term data shows little  change.

Oregon's goal of reducing CO2 emissions by 40% in just 12 years will cause  major disruptions if implemented the way Oregon's Global Warming Commission  advises. They ignore the one  move that would actually lower our cost of energy and meet the  CO2 goal at the same time: nuclear.

Instead they want to price energy so high that you are forced to  use 40% less heat in the winter and drive 40% less.

They Say it is OK to Lie To Us!


On World Population Day, take note:

population isn’t the problem

BBC: Himalayan glaciers melting deadline 'a mistake'  (more)  (More)

Plagued by reports of sloppy work, falsifications and exaggerations, climate research is facing a crisis of confidence. How reliable are the predictions about global warming and its consequences?

A Superstorm for Global Warming Research,      (Local)

Help Stamp Out Climate Illiteracy -

Learn How To Rationally Argue Global Warming

AMS Survey: 75% of Meteorologists

DO NOT think most global warming is human induced

1989 news: “entire nations could be wiped off the face of the earth by rising sea levels if global warming is not reversed by the year 2000. “

San Jose Mercury News (CA) - June 30, 1989

(that date is not a typo - this is just another example of used car salesman tactics from the alarmists):

Story of Another Scientific Fraud

The MMR vaccine scare - a scientific fraud that appears to have run its course from a profiteering scientist, an ignorant press getting taken in, to exposure after an investigation. Also BBC



5000 years ago, there was the Egyptian 1st Unified Kingdom warm period   

4400 years ago, there was the Egyptian old kingdom warm period.

3000 years ago, there was the Minoan Warm period. It was warmer than now WITHOUT fossil fuels.

Then 1000 years later, there was the Roman warm period.  It was warmer than now WITHOUT fossil fuels.

Then 1000 years later, there was the Medieval warm period.  It was warmer than now WITHOUT fossil fuels.

1000 years later, came our current warm period.


Climate alarmists are claiming that whatever caused those earlier warm periods suddenly quit causing warm periods, only to be replaced by man's CO2, perfectly in time for the cycle of warmth every 1000 years to stay on schedule.  

Not very believable!

The entire climate scam crumbles on this one observation because it shows that there is nothing unusual about today's temperature and  thus CO2 is not causing warming or unusual climate.

Evidence that those warm periods actually occurred:    


Evidence that the Roman & Medieval warm periods were global:



Please note:

1-Evidence of warming, unusual weather, storms, floods IS NOT evidence that man's CO2 is the cause.

2-Correlation is not causation

3-An expert’s assertion, or government’s assertion is not evidence. It is hearsay.

4-Consensus of experts, Polls or Majority belief is not evidence

5-Climate models are not evidence.

6--Warmest weather in 100 years means it was warmer 100 years ago when CO2 was lower.

7-If an event is NOT unprecedented, then you have to explain why whatever caused the earlier events is NOT the cause of the latest occurrence of that event.


Evidence is actual data PRO AND CON with reasoned analysis and logical conclusions while FULLY CONSIDERING OPPOSING evidence.